In fall 1995 the University of Florida student body enacted a new honor code and voluntarily committed itself to the highest standards of honesty and integrity. When students enroll at the university, they commit themselves to the standard drafted and enacted by the students.
Preamble: In adopting this honor code, the students of the University of Florida recognize that academic honesty and integrity are fundamental values of the university community.
Students who enroll at the university commit to holding themselves and their peers to the high standard of honor required by the honor code.
Any individual who becomes aware of a violation of the honor code is bound by honor to take corrective action. A student-run Honor Court and faculty support are crucial to the success of the honor code. The quality of a University of Florida education is dependent upon community acceptance and enforcement of the honor code.
The Honor Code: We, the members of the University of Florida community, pledge to hold ourselves and our peers to the highest standards of honesty and integrity.
On all work submitted for credit by students at the University of Florida, the following pledge is either required or implied:
"On my honor, I have neither given nor received unauthorized aid in doing this assignment."
Matters of violations of academic honesty are adjudicated by the Student Honor Court, the Health Center Student Conduct Standards Committee, the Student Conduct Committee, the College of Law Honor Committee and faculty.
Cheating: The improper taking or tendering of any information or material which shall be used to determine academic credit. Taking of information includes, but is not limited to, copying graded homework assignments from another student; working together with another individual(s) on a take-home test or homework when not specifically permitted by the teacher; looking or attempting to look at another student's paper during an examination; looking or attempting to look at text or notes during an examination when not permitted.
Tendering of information includes, but is not limited to, giving your work to another student to be used or copied; giving someone answers to exam questions either when the exam is being given or after taking an exam; giving or selling a term paper or other written materials to another student; sharing information on a graded assignment.
Plagiarism: The attempt to represent the work of another as the product of one's own thought, whether the other's work is published or unpublished, or simply the work of a fellow student.
Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, quoting oral or written materials without citation on an exam, term paper, homework, other written materials or oral presentations for an academic requirement; submitting a paper which was purchased from a term paper service as your own work; submitting anyone else's paper as your own work.
Bribery: The offering, giving, receiving or soliciting of any materials, items or services of value to gain academic advantage for yourself or another.
Misrepresentation: Any act or omission with intent to deceive a teacher for academic advantage. Misrepresentation includes using computer programs generated by another and handing it in as your own work unless expressly allowed by the teacher; lying to a teacher to increase your grade; lying or misrepresenting facts when confronted with an allegation of academic dishonesty.
Conspiracy: The planning or acting with one or more persons to commit any form of academic dishonesty to gain academic advantage for yourself or another.
Fabrication: The use of invented or fabricated information, or the falsification of research or other findings with the intent to deceive for academic or professional advantage.
Authority: The president is charged with responsibility for establishing and enforcing regulations governing student life. Regulations are designed to enable the university to protect against the conduct of those who, by their actions, impair or infringe on the rights of others or interfere with the orderly operations of the university. Discipline may be imposed for offenses against the Student Conduct Code occurring at any of the following locations or activities:
The record of student judicial hearings are in the student's educational record and are closed, unless the accused student requests an open hearing a minimum of five working days before the hearing. All student witnesses must agree in writing to this request.
The findings of the hearing officer/committee are based on the preponderance of the evidence.
Suspension of Student Pending Hearing: Violations of the Student Conduct Code, Section V.A.(l)L. and V.A.(l)R., may result in immediate suspension. If in the determination of the Director of Student Judicial Affairs, the student poses a significant danger of imminent and serious physical harm to himself/herself or others at the university, or immediate suspension is necessary to protect the health, safety or welfare of the student or others at the university, the Director of Student Judicial Affairs, with approval of the Vice President for Student Affairs, may suspend the student pending a hearing before the appropriate hearing body. The hearing will take place within a reasonable time after notification of the suspension.
Violations of the Code of Conduct:
1. Violations-The following are violations of the Student Conduct Code and may result in sanctions being imposed upon the offenders:
3. The Student Honor Court may recommend expulsion or any lesser sanction for academic dishonesty as defined by the Student Conduct Code and Academic Honesty Guidelines. Conflicts in jurisdiction will be resolved by the Director of Student Judicial Affairs.
4. Residence Hall Conduct Boards, the Coordinator for Residential Judicial Programs and Residential Directors may recommend sanctions as set forth by the Office for Student Services for violation of the Student Conduct Code and Division of Housing rules and regulations.
5. Student Traffic Court may impose authorized penalties for violation of university traffic, parking, and vehicle registration regulations.
6. The Health Center Student Conduct Standards Committee hears cases of alleged academic dishonesty by students of the Health Center colleges. The committee is comprised of faculty and students from the Health Center, appointed by the president. Recommendations of responsibility and sanctions, if appropriate, are made to the Dean for Student Services for final action.
7. The College of Law Honor Committee hears cases of alleged academic dishonesty by students in the College of Law. Recommendations of guilt or innocence and sanctions, if appropriate, are made to the Appellate Board for final action.
8. The Director and Assistant Director for Student Judicial Affairs adjudicates cases of alleged student conduct code violations.
9. Other judicial bodies may be established and vested with jurisdiction by appropriate authority.
Off-Campus Conduct: When a student violates city, state or federal law by an offense committed off campus which is not associated with a university-connected activity, the disciplinary authority of the university will not be used merely to duplicate the penalty awarded for such an act under applicable ordinances and laws. The university will take disciplinary action against a student for such an off-campus offense only when it is required by law to do so or when the nature of the offense is such that in the judgment of the Director of Student Judicial Affairs, the continued presence of the student on campus is likely to interfere with the educational process or the orderly operation of the university; or the continued presence of the student on campus is likely to endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the university community or is intimidating or threatening to another individual within the University Community; or the offense committed by the student is of such a serious nature as to adversely affect the students suitability as a member of the University Community. If the Director of Student Judicial Affairs determines that disciplinary action is warranted, the Director of Student Judicial Affairs shall notify the student in accordance with Rule 6C1-4.16(5). The action of the university with respect to any off-campus conduct shall be made independent of any off-campus authority.
Postponement of Hearing Due to Pending or Possible Criminal or Civil Charges: If the student charged with a violation of the Student Conduct Code, regardless of which primary judicial body may hear the matter, wishes to have the hearing postponed because there is pending or possible civil or criminal litigation which he/she feels might be prejudiced by the findings of the hearing, such postponement may be granted provided the student agrees to accept conduct probation or suspension, depending upon the gravity of the offense. Such probation or suspension will be determined and activated by the Director of Student Judicial Affairs and will remain in force until such time as the student requests a hearing before the appropriate primary judicial body and the hearing is held. The student shall be informed whether he/she would be placed on probation or suspended prior to making a decision to postpone the hearing.
Student Waiver of Right to Hearing: In the event a student charged with a violation of the Student Conduct Code desires to waive the right to a hearing by the appropriate official or hearing body, and the student so indicates in writing, the Director of Student Judicial Affairs, Assistant Director of Student Judicial Affairs, Coordinator of Residential Judicial Programs, or Residence Directors, provided he/she agrees to accept jurisdiction, may make a determination of fact and take appropriate action concerning the alleged violation.
Summary Hearing: In the event a student charged with a violation of the Student Conduct Code, which in the opinion of the Director of Student Judicial Affairs, if proven, would not warrant a penalty in excess of two semesters probation, and the student does not waive his or her right to a hearing before the appropriate official or hearing body, the Director of Student Judicial Affairs may require a hearing to be held before the chairperson of the Committee on Student Conduct or the chairperson's designated representative rather than before the full committee.
Conflict of Jurisdiction: In the event that the offense is within the jurisdiction of more than one primary judicial body, the Director of Student Judicial Affairs shall determine which judicial body shall hear the charge.
Sanctions: A student adjudicated responsible for violations of the Student Conduct Code shall be subject to sanctions commensurate with the offense with consideration given to any aggravating and mitigating circumstances. Sanctions may include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following sanctions, unless otherwise expressly provided: